FCE - Examination Report Jun 2000 0100-0102.pdf

(155 KB) Pobierz
Microsoft Word - june 2000 row 0100 & 0102.doc
First Certificate in English
Examination Report
Syllabuses 0100 and 0102
JUNE 2000
CONTENTS
Page
Introduction
1
Paper 1 - Reading
3
Paper 2 - Writing
7
Paper 3 - Use of English
14
Paper 4 - Listening
19
Paper 5 - Speaking
24
Feedback Form
30
© UCLES 2000 0100/0102
INTRODUCTION
The First Certificate in English examination appeared in its revised format for the first time in
December 1996.
This Report is intended to provide a general view of how candidates performed on each
paper and to offer guidance on the preparation of candidates. Candidates took either FCE
Syllabus 100 (Tuesday) or FCE Syllabus 102 (Saturday).
The overall pass rate for 0100 was 74.76% and for 0102 was 76.50%.
The following table gives details of the percentage of candidates at each grade.
0100
0102
GRADE
PERCENTAGE
PERCENTAGE
A
7.96
7.34
B
25.90
26.23
C
40.90
42.94
D
10.01
9.73
E
15.23
13.77
Grading
Grading took place during July 2000 (approximately six weeks after the examination).
The five FCE papers total 200 marks, after weighting. Papers 1-5 are each weighted to 40
marks. The candidate’s overall FCE grade is based on the total score gained by the
candidate in all five papers. Candidates do not ‘pass’ or ‘fail’ in a particular paper, but rather
in the examination as a whole.
The overall grades (A, B, C, D, and E) are set according to the following information:
statistics on the candidature;
statistics on the overall candidate performance;
statistics on individual items, for those parts of the examination for which this is
appropriate (Papers 1, 3 and 4);
the advice of the Principal Examiners, based on the performance of candidates, and on
the recommendation of examiners where this is relevant (Papers 2 and 5);
comparison with statistics from previous years' examination performance and candidature.
Results are reported as three passing grades (A, B and C) and two failing grades (D and E).
The minimum successful performance which a candidate typically requires in order to
achieve a grade C corresponds to about 60% of the total marks. Every candidate is provided
with a Statement of Results which includes a graphical display of the candidate’s
performance in each component. These are shown against the scale Exceptional – Good –
Borderline – Weak and indicate the candidate’s relative performance in each paper.
Awards
The Awarding Committee meets after the grade boundaries have been confirmed. It deals
with all cases for special consideration, e.g., temporary disability, unsatisfactory examination
conditions, suspected collusion, etc. The committee can ask for scripts to be re-marked,
check results, change grades, withhold results, etc. Results may be withheld because of
infringement of the regulations or because further investigation is needed. Centres are
notified if a candidate’s result has been scrutinised by the Awarding Committee.
Notification of Results
© UCLES 2000 0100/0102
1
26268392.001.png
Statements of results slips are issued through centres approximately two months after the
examination has been taken. Certificates are issued about six weeks after the issue of
statements of results slips. Requests for a check on results may be made through centres,
within one month of the issue of statements of results.
UCLES produces the following documents which may be of use in preparing candidates for
FCE:
Regulations (produced annually, for information on dates, etc.);
FCE Handbook (for detailed information on the examination and sample materials);
Examination Report (produced after each administration);
Past Paper Pack (available approximately 10 weeks after each examination session,
including Question Papers for Papers 1 - 4, sample Speaking Test materials, answer
keys, cassette, and Paper 2 mark schemes and sample scripts).
Users of this Examination Report may find it useful to refer simultaneously to the
relevant Past Paper Packs. These, together with further copies of this report are available
from:
EFL Information
University of Cambridge Local Examination Syndicate
1 Hills Road
Cambridge
CB1 2EU
UK
Tel: +44 (1)223 553355
Fax: +44 (1)223 460278
email: efl@ucles.org.uk
www.cambridge-efl.org.uk
Feedback on this Report is very welcome and should be sent to the Reports Co-ordinator,
EFL, at the above address. Please use the feedback form at the end of this report.
© UCLES 2000 0100/0102
2
PAPER 1 - READING
Part
Task Type and Focus
Number of
Questions
Task Format
1
Multiple-matching
Main focus: main points
Syllabus
0100
Syllabus
0102
A text preceded by multiple-
matching questions.
7
7
Candidates must match a
prompt from one list to a
prompt in another list, or match
prompts to elements in the text.
2
Multiple-choice
Main focus: detail
7
8
A text followed by four-option
multiple-choice questions.
3
Gapped text
Main focus: text structure
6
6
A text from which paragraphs
or sentences have been
removed and placed in jumbled
order after the text. Candidates
must decide from where in the
text the paragraphs or
sentences have been removed.
4
Multiple-matching,
multiple-choice
Main focus: specific
information
15
14
As Part 1
Marking
Candidates record their answers on a separate answer sheet, which is scanned by
computer. Questions in Parts 1, 2 and 3 carry two marks each. Questions in Part 4 carry
one mark each. The total score is adjusted to give a mark out of 40.
Candidate performance
In general, candidates coped very competently with the four task formats of the papers. The
difficulty levels of the two papers, as ascertained from pretesting, were comparable.
Statistical evidence showed that the questions in all four parts provided a very reliable
assessment of candidates' relative ability levels.
© UCLES 2000 0100/0102
3
26268392.002.png
 
Syllabus 0100 (Tuesday)
Part 1, Rock the boat
This summary-sentence task, focusing on the understanding of the main points in the text,
was competently handled by most candidates, and was the easiest part of the test.
Questions 3 and 6 were the easiest, while Question 1 was the most difficult. The most
popular incorrect response was D. While the 'delay' in the text is certainly a problem, the
element of rising to a challenge is not evident in the paragraph.
Part 2, A new voice on the radio
This four-option multiple-choice task focused mainly on candidates' detailed comprehension,
but also included a reference question. Question 11 stood out as the easiest item, while 10
caused more problems, particularly for the weaker group. Option A was their favoured
choice. Margherita refers to 'the odd disaster', a phrase which candidates would not be
expected to understand out of context, but they would be expected to realise at this level that
'For instance' introduced one example of several errors.
Part 3, Welsh mountains
This gapped-paragraph task, focusing on text structure, discriminated well, and was, in
general, competently handled. Questions 15 and 16 proved to be straightforward for most
candidates, with 19 being the most difficult. In this question, weaker candidates were
apparently unable to make the connection between 'it died away' and 'the storm around us'.
Their incorrect responses were evenly spread, while almost all the good candidates gave the
correct response.
Part 4, A place to play
This multiple-matching task focused on candidates' ability to retrieve specific information
from the text. The easiest questions were 25, 26 and 30, while 33 and 34 posed more
problems for weaker candidates, and their answers were again evenly spread over the
incorrect options. Again, almost all the good candidates got the questions right.
© UCLES 2000 0100/0102
4
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin