The New Tesla Electromagnetics.pdf

The Tom Bearden Website

Support Free Energy and purchase the bumper sticker

The New Tesla Electromagnetics and the Secrets of Electrical Free Energy

By T.E. Bearden

Table of Contents

Foreword

Comments on the New Tesla Electromagnetics:

Part I: Discrepancies in the Present EM Theory

by T. E. Bearden

Comments on the New Tesla Electromagnetics:

Part II: The Secret of Electrical Free Energy

by T. E. Bearden

Overture to a New Age Technology

by Dr. Rolf Schaffranke

REVIEW AND OUTLOOK - The Development of Post-

Relativistic Concepts in Physics and Advanced Technology

Abroad

by Dr. Rolf Schaffrancke

http://www.cheniere.org/books/newteslaem/index.html24.11.2003 21:35:32

The Tom Bearden Website

The Tom Bearden

Website

COMMENTS ON THE NEW TESLA ELECTROMAGNETICS

Part I: Discrepancies in Present EM Theory

There are at least twenty-two major discrepancies presently existing in

conventional electromagnetics theory. This paper presents a summary

of those flaws, and is a further commentary on my discussion of scalar

longitudinal Tesla waves in a previous paper, "Solutions to Tesla's

Secrets and the Soviet Tesla Weapons," Tesla Book Company, 1981

and 1982.

I particularly wish to express my deep appreciation to two of my

friends and colleagues who at this time, I believe, wish to remain

anonymous. One of the two is an experimental genius who can

produce items on the bench that do not work by orthodox theory. The

second is a master of materials science and electromagnetics theory. I

thank them both for their exceptional contributions and stimuli

regarding potential shortcomings in present electromagnetics theory,

and their forbearance with the many discussions we have held on this

and related subjects.

It goes without saying that any errors in this paper are strictly my own,

and not the fault of either of my distinguished colleagues.

(1) In present electromagnetics theory, charge and charged mass are

falsely made identical. Actually, on a charged particle, the "charge" is

the flux of virtual particles on the "bare particle" of observable mass.

The charged particle is thus a "system" of true massless charge

coupled to a bare chargeless mass. The observable "mass" is static,

three-dimensional, and totally spatial. "Charge" is dynamic, four-

dimensional or more, virtual and spatiotemporal. Further, the charge

and observable mass can be decoupled, contrary to present theory.

Decoupled charge -- that is, the absence of mass -- is simply what we

presently refer to as "vacuum." Vacuum, spacetime, and massless

charge are all identical. Rigorously, we should utilize any of these

three as an "ether," as suggested for vacuum by Einstein himself (see

http://www.cheniere.org/books/newteslaem/22discrepancies.htm (1 of 11)24.11.2003 21:35:38

The Tom Bearden Website

Max Born, Einstein's Theory of Relativity , Revised Edition, Dover

Publications, New York, 1965, p. 224). And all three of them are

identically anenergy -- not energy, but more fundamental components

of energy.

(2) Electrostatic potential is regarded as a purely 3-dimensional spatial

stress . Instead, it is the intensity of a many-dimensional (at least four-

dimensional) virtual flux and a stress on all four dimensions of

spacetime. This is easily seen, once one recognizes that spacetime is

identically massless charge. (It is not "filled" with charge; rather, it is

charge!) Just as, in a gas under pressure, the accumulation of

additional gas further stresses the gas, the accumulation of charge

(spacetime) stresses charge (spacetime). Further, if freed from its

attachment to mass , charge can flow exclusively in time, exclusively

in space, or in any combination of the two. Tesla waves -- which are

scalar waves in pure massless charge flux itself -- thus can exhibit

extraordinary characteristics that ordinary vector waves do not

possess. And Tesla waves have extra dimensional degrees of freedom

in which to move, as compared to vector waves. Indeed, one way to

visualize a Tesla scalar wave is to regard it as a pure oscillation of time

itself.

(3) Voltage and potential are often confused in the electrostatic case ,

or at least thought of as "composed of the same thing." For that reason,

voltage is regarded as "potential drop". This also is not true.

Rigorously, the potential is the intensity of the virtual particle flux at a

single point -- whether or not there is any mass at the point -- and both

the pressure and the point itself are spatiotemporal (4-dimensional),

not spatial (3-dimensional) as presently assumed. Voltage represents

the spatial intersection of the difference in the potential between two

separated spatial points, and always implies at least a miniscule flow

of mass current (that is what makes it spatial!). "Voltage" is spatial and

depends upon the presence of observable mass flow, while scalar

electrostatic potential is spatiotemporal and depends upon the absence

of observable mass flow. The two are not even of the same

dimensionality.

(4) The charge of vacuum spacetime is assumed to be zero, when in

fact it is a very high value . Vacuum has no mass, but it has great

massless charge and virtual particle charge flux. For proof that a

charged vacuum is the seat of something in motion, see G.M. Graham

and D.G. Lahoz, "Observation of static electromagnetic angular

momentum in vacuo," Nature, Vol. 285, 15 .May 1980, pp. 154-155.

In fact, vacuum IS charge , identically , and it is also "spacetime" and at

least four-dimensional.

http://www.cheniere.org/books/newteslaem/22discrepancies.htm (2 of 11)24.11.2003 21:35:38

The Tom Bearden Website

(5) Contrary to its present usage, zero is dimensional and relative in its

context. A three-dimensional spatial hole, for example, exists in time.

If we model time as a dimension, then the spatial hole has one

dimension in 4-space. So a spatial absence is a spatiotemporal

presence. In the vacuum 4-space, a spatial nothing is still a something.

The "virtual" concept and the mathematical concept of a derivative are

simply two present ways of unconsciously addressing this fundamental

problem of the dimensional relativity of zero.

(6) The concepts of "space" and "time" imply that spacetime (vacuum)

has been separated into two parts. We can only think of a space as

"continuing to exist in time " To separate vacuum spacetime into two

pieces, an operation is continually required. The operator that

accomplishes this splitting operation is the photon interaction, the

interaction of vector electromagnetic energy or waves with mass. I

have already strongly pointed out this effect and presented a "raindrop

model" of first-order physical change itself in my book, The Excalibur

Briefing, Strawberry Hill Press, San Francisco, 1980, pp. 128-130.

(7) "Vector magnetic potential" is assumed to be always an aspect of

(and connected to) the magnetic field. In fact it is a separate,

fundamental field of nature and it can be entirely disconnected from

the magnetic field. See Richard P. Feynman et al, The Feynman

Lectures on Physics, Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., New York,

1964, Vol. II, pp. 15-8 to 15-14. Curiously, this fact has been proven

for years' yet it has been almost completely ignored in the West. The

"Vx" operator, when applied to the A-field, makes B-field. If the Vx

operator is not applied, the "freed" A-field possesses much-expanded

characteristics from those presently allowed in the "bound" theory.

Specifically, it becomes a scalar or "shadow vector" field; it is not a

normal vector field. (note: for V read inverted capital Delta)

(8) The speed of light in vacuum is assumed to be a fundamental

constant of nature. Instead it is a function of the intensity of the

massless charge flux (that is, of the magnitude of the electrostatic

potential) of the vacuum in which it moves. (Indeed, since vacuum and

massless charge are one and the same, one may say that the speed of

light is a function of the intensity of the spatiotemporal vacuum!). The

higher the flux intensity (charge) of the vacuum, the faster the speed of

light in it. This is an observed fact and already shown by hardcore

measurements. For example, distinct differences actually exist in the

speed of light in vacuo, when measured on the surface of the earth as

compared to measurements in space away from planetary masses. In a

vacuum on the surface of the earth, light moves significantly faster.

For a discussion and the statistics, see B. N. Belyaev, "On Random

Fluctuations of the Velocity of Light in Vacuum," Soviet Physics

http://www.cheniere.org/books/newteslaem/22discrepancies.htm (3 of 11)24.11.2003 21:35:38

The Tom Bearden Website

Journal , No. 11, Nov. 1980, pp. 37-42 (original in Russian; translation

by Plenum Publishing Corporation.) The Russians have used this

knowledge for over two decades in their strategic psychotronics

(energetics) program; yet hardly a single U.S. scientist is aware of the

measured variation of c in vacuo. In fact, most Western scientists

simply cannot believe it when it is pointed out to them!

(9) Energy is considered fundamental and equivalent to work. In fact,

energy arises from vector processes, and it can be disassembled into

more fundamental (anenergy) scalar components, since the vectors

can. These scalar components individually can be moved to a distant

location without expending work, since one is not moving force

vectors. There the scalar components can be joined and reassembled

into vectors to provide "free energy" appearing at a distance, with no

loss in between the initial and distant points. For proof that a vector

field can be replaced by (and considered to be composed of) two scalar

fields, see E. T. Whittaker, Proceedings of the London Mathematical

Society, Volume 1, 1903, p. 367. By extension, any vector wave can

be replaced by two coupled scalar waves.

(10) The classical Poynting vector predicts no longitudinal wave of

energy from a time-varying, electrically charged source, In fact, an

exact solution of the problem does allow this longitudinal wave . See T.

D. Keech and J. F. Corum, "A New Derivation for the Field of a Time-

Varying Charge in Einstein's Theory," International Journal of

Theoretical Physics, Vol. 20, No, 1, 1981, pp. 63-68 for the proof.

(11) The present concepts of vector and scalar are severely limited,

and do not permit the explicit consideration of the internal, finer-

grained structures of a vector or a scalar. That is, a fundamental

problem exists with the basic assumptions in the vector mathematics

itself. The "space'' of a vector field, for example, does not have inter-

nested sublevels (subspaces) containing finer "shadow vectors" or

"virtual vectors," Yet particle physics has already discovered that

electrical reality is built that way. Thus one should actually use a

"hypernumber" theory after the manner of Charles Musés. A scalar is

filled with (and composed of) nested levels of other "spaces''

containing vectors, where these sum to "zero" in the ordinary

observable frame without an observable vector resultant. In Musés'

mathematics, for example, zero has real roots. Real physical devices

can be -- and have been -constructed in accordance with Muses'

theory. For an introduction to Musés' profound hypernumbers

approach, see Charles Musés' foreword to Jerome Rothstein,

Communication Organization and Science , The Falcon's Wing Press,

Indian Hills, Colorado, 1958. See also Charles Musés, "Applied

Hypernumbers: Computational Concepts," Applied Mathematics and

http://www.cheniere.org/books/newteslaem/22discrepancies.htm (4 of 11)24.11.2003 21:35:38

Plik z chomika:

Inne pliki z tego folderu:

Inne foldery tego chomika: