Haramein, Rauscher, Hyson - Scaling law for all matter.pdf

(767 KB) Pobierz
SCALE UNIFICATION – A UNIVERSAL
SCALING LAW FOR ORGANIZED MATTER
Nassim Haramein, Michael Hyson, E. A. Rauscher §
Abstract. From observational data and our theoretical analysis, we demonstrate that a scaling law can be written for
all organized matter utilizing the Schwarzschild condition, describing cosmological to sub-atomic structures. Of
interest are solutions involving torque and Coriolis effects in the field equations. Significant observations have led
to theoretical and experimental advancement describing systems undergoing gravitational collapse, including
vacuum interactions. The universality of this scaling law suggests an underlying polarizable structured vacuum of
mini white holes/black holes. We briefly discuss the manner in which this structured vacuum can be described in
terms of resolution of scale analogous to a fractal-like scaling as a means of renormalization at the Planck distance.
Finally, we describe a new horizon we term the “spin horizon” which is defined as a result of a spacetime torque
producing boundary conditions in a magnetohydrodynamic structure.
INTRODUCTION
In astrophysics, black holes have been ubiquitously confirmed from large scale super-giants such as quasars and
galactic centers to smaller stellar size black hole systems. These new discoveries represent a long term progress to
confirm the 1916 Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equations. The observed black hole at the center of the
Milky Way galaxy was first discovered by its gravitational influence on nearby stars. So far, black holes seem to
have been found at the center of all galaxies that have been carefully examined [1]. Now, quasars and globular
clusters, have been found to host large black holes and stellar black holes are well documented [1].
In this paper we develop a scaling law utilizing the Schwarzschild condition as well as discuss charge and
rotation within a modified Kerr-Newman metric (the Haramein-Rauscher solution involving torque and Coriolis
effects in the field equations [2]) for cosmological, galactic, stellar and micro physical black holes. It is important to
note that all observed objects, from macro to micro, are predominantly x-ray emitters, which is typical of black hole
horizons. At the horizon the gravitational force balances the electromagnetic radiation, a state previously thought to
be only present at cosmogenesis, which implies a continuous creation model. This is based on the topology of
“Schwarzschild’s zones” generating cells depicting a dynamic expanding and contracting universe first described by
Wheeler and Lindquist [3]. Thermodynamic and acoustic processes occupy an important role in energy transfer
between gravitational attraction, magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) and electrodynamic repulsion [4]. Solving the
collective and coherent behavior of plasma MHD soliton structures, their thermo and acouston dynamics, results in a
good description of the processes occurring externally, near and at the horizons of black holes [4]. A dual brane
torus model of a U group and the cuboctahedral cover group is utilized (see Appendix A). This approach leads to a
polarized structured vacuum and an extended unified model. This model is a central feature of the Harameinian
topological picture [4, 5, 6].
At the cosmological resolution, plasma dynamics surrounding the event horizon give us a good indication
of the fundamental structure underlying the dynamical vacuum state polarization, its relationship to the event
horizon [4, 7] and the topology of the spacetime manifold. Some recent observations by the Wide Field Planetary
Camera 2 of the Hubble Space Telescope of Supernova SN1987A and Nebula MyCn18 (so-called Hourglass
Nebula) and large galactic superstructures display certain qualities that relate to the plasma state field and its
interaction with the vacuum structure producing double torus-like dynamics [8, 9, 10].
In this paper, we have developed a scaling law for the universal, galactic, stellar– solar and atomic scale
frequencies vs. radius of the system, with the consideration of a fundamental response of these systems within the
surrounding structured vacuum polarization, and we briefly discuss a new approach to renormalization. In this
paper, we will touch on the details of the field topology and its intera ction with the vacuum structure, and focus
mostly on describing our scaling law where we compare our scaling rotation to the standard atomic model in which
1A~10 -8 cm. By way of comparison, we find the Big Bang cosmogenic parameters, R~10 -33 cm and ~2 x 10 43 Hz
and the current universe at R ~ 10 28 cm. We derive a scaling law and discuss possible explanations of the missing
Director of Research, The Resonance Project Foundation, haramein@theresonanceproject.org
Research Director, Sirius Institute, michaelhyson@yahoo.com
§
Tecnic Research Laboratory, 3500 S. Tomahawk Road, Bldg. 188, Apache Junction, AZ 85219
Preprint: N. Haramein, M. Hyson, E. A. Rauscher, Proceedings of The Unified Theories Conference (2008), Scale
Unification: A Universal Scaling Law for Organized Matter, in Cs Varga, I. Dienes & R.L. Amoroso (eds.)
mass of the Universe in terms of vacuum state, polarizable and nonlinear structures which includes a new
description of solar dynamics to generate the physics of a unified view [2, 4].
1. THE SCALING EQUATION FROM MACRO TO MICRO COSMOS IN TERMS OF FREQUENCY,
VS. RADIUS, R
The primary constraint on the conditions relatin g the frequency of a system to its radius is through the
Schwarzschild condition. Schwarzschild’s 1916 solution is an extension solution to Einstein’s gravitational field
equations, which were published in 1915. The Schwarzschild solution is the most simple and elegant solution to the
field equations for a spherical system. [11] This solution represents a space-time curvature structure produced by
the presence of matter-energy. The field equations represent the universality of the gravitational f orce as
represented by a spin 2 tensor gravitation, expressed as the curvature of four space or space-time. The
Schwarzschild condition is given for the Schwarzschild radius, R s and mass m s as
2
Gm
R
s
(1)
s
2
c
2 G
c
for the constant
where G is the gravitational constant and c is the velocity of light. This term is
2
2
G
c
28
 cm/gm,
1.48
10
(2)
2
2 G
c

R
which we term
, so that
.
m
2
s
J. A. Wheeler used the Schwarzschild solution as the solution for a black hole, a system in which gravity is
so strong that light, once absorbed, cannot be reemitted. This led to the search for astrophysical black holes. He
attempted to apply this description of the structure of space-time in order to explain the generation of the
electromagnetic forces in terms of the micro “quantum” structure described by mini Planck black holes [12, 13, 14].
R.W. Lindquist and Wheeler also published work depicting a “dynamic lattice universe” based on the topology of
Schwarzschild membrane zones arranged to generate cells [3] (See Fig. 1a).
This topological approach results in a dynamic expanding and contracting universe, where a test particle is
found to rise and fall against the gravitational attraction. This author expresses a concentric black hole/white hole
theorem by combining a Kerr-Newman charge and rotation metric of the Haramein-Rauscher solution [2] with the
concept of an expanding and contracting Schwarzschild cell.
E.A. Rauscher [13], and more recently Haramein and Rauscher [2, 4, 14], developed a scaling law for
physical variables as a function of the radius of the expanding universe. This cosmogenic model depends on the
approximation that the universe obeys the Schwarzschild condition given by R s ~ 10 -28 cm/gm M u yielding R u = R s
~ 10 28 cm with the current universe radius at R u ~ 10 28 cm and a mass of M u ~ 10 56 gm. The early Big Bang
conditions, as conceived of, yields R s ~ 10 -28 cm/gm m pl where m pl is the mass of the initial Planck black hole of
m pl ~ 10 -5 gm giving R s ~ ~ 10 -33 cm, the Planck length.
Haramein [5] and Rauscher [13] have developed a detailed scaling law for the characteristic frequency of a
system and its radius [4]. This unique scaling law treats cosmological and micro systems in terms of black hole
physics, under the Schwarzschild condition, for various systems, which are also ubiquitous x-ray emitters. This
approach will be expanded to include the nature of a variety of black hole conditions. These conditions will not
describe the detailed, more complex dynamics of each specific black hole system, but will, in general form, obey the
first order Schwarzschild condition. Some of the more complex dynamics include x-ray emissions due to energy
exchange of rotating and rotating-charged black holes [15, 16]. More appropriate descriptions of the origin of spin
and its implications to the Field equations will yield new physics, such as the Haramein-Rauscher solution with
torque and Coriolis forces [2]. Of particular interest is the description of local plasma and thermodynamic
properties described by the Kerr and Kerr-Newman solutions for black holes, and the application of this
understanding to micro-physics [4].
We can categorize the types of black hole solutions in the following manner. In general, a collapsing black hole
system preserves its mass, electric charge and angular momentum or rotation. There are five general categories of
black hole solutions. They are: (1) an uncharged, non-rotating black hole which is described by the Schwarzschild
solution field equations, (2) a charged, non-rotating black hole which is described by the Reisner-Nordstrom
solution, (3) an uncharged but rotating black hole which is described by the Kerr solution, (4) a rotating, charged
black hole which is described by the Kerr-Newman solution and 5) the Haramein-Rauscher solution with the
2
778638993.013.png
 
inclusion of torque and Coriolis forces to define the origin of spin. [2] Returning to our Schwarzschild condition,
we have calculated the conditions for micro to macro cosmological black holes [16]. Consider the usual
Schwarzschild condition given above. Haramein, [5, 6] Rauscher [13, 17] and others have noted that at the universal
scale for R u = 10 28 cm and M u = 10 56 gm and where
2
G
c
28

1.48
10
cm/gm,
(3)
2
we find a set of conditions for the entire universe as a black hole, i.e., the mass of our universe exceeds the mass of a
system needed to overcome the escape velocity of light [12].
Figure 1(a)
Figure1(b)
Figure 1(c)
Figure 1. The Lattice Universe, Kerr-Newman and Haramein Topologies
a) Lindquist and Wheeler dynamic universe utilizing a Schwarzschild-cell method [3] (from Lindquist and Wheeler Fig.
27.3) Many Schwarzschild zones are fitted together to make a closed universe. This universe is dynamic because a test
particle at the interface between two zones rises up against the gravitational attraction of each and falls back under the
gravitational attraction of each. Therefore the two centers themselves have to move apart and move back together again.
The same being true for all other pairs of centers, it follows that the lattice universe itself expands and recontracts even
though each Schwarzschild is viewed individually as static. This diagram taken from Lindquist and Wheeler (1957). b)
Typical representation of a Kerr-Newman black hole (C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne and J. A. Wheeler, Gravitation, Freeman
and Co. (1973), p. 880). c) A schematic model of the N. Haramein toroidal topological membrane of a dual
manifold and its singularity in a cuboctahedral field [2] (See Appendix A).
U
U
U
U
1
1
1
1
3
778638993.014.png 778638993.015.png 778638993.001.png 778638993.002.png
2. A SCALING LAW OF FREQUENCY VS RADIUS FOR BLACK HOLES
There appear to be different mass groupings of black holes. These categories of black holes fit well with the scaling
model of Haramein [5, 6] and Rauscher [2, 4, 17]. The three main categories that astrophysicists have identified are,
(1) “stellar” black holes, having a few times the Sun’s mass, (2) a mid-size black hole of perhaps 200 to
500 (3) “supermassive” black holes having a range of masses from 10 6 to 10 9 M , at the center of
galaxies and including quasars which are currently considered to be such black holes. However, the manner in
which these systems, from supermassive to stellar black holes relate to each other, and certainly the manner in which
micro physics relates is currently theoretically unclear. It may be that by describing all organized matter as various
stages of evolution of black hole dynamics, and through the Haramein [5, 6] and Rauscher scaling law [2, 4, 13, 14],
that these various systems can be related and understood to include microphysics as well. This will be discussed
later in this paper.
We hypothesize that the characteristic frequency for the super giant black holes are of the order of, or less
than, the characteristic frequency of the mid-size or intermediate black holes. We denote the mid-size black holes as
G 1 and the super massive black holes as G 2 in our scaling law (See Figure 2a). Note that these systems are also x-
ray emitters due to the plasma envelope surrounding them. We have developed a scaling law for the universal,
galactic, stellar – solar and atomic scale frequencies with the consideration of a fundamental dynamical form of
these systems within the Schwarzschild model. We plot fundamental associated frequencies, , vs. radius R of
each of the systems (See Table 1. and Figure 2a).
In Figure 2a, we give the characteristic frequency and radius for each system derived from the
Schwarzschild condition. We also give the mass for each system as well as the associated velocity, for verification
of the model, which is approximately the velocity of light. In the figure we display an approximate plot of the
various black hole systems. A more detailed analysis is currently in progress [14].
We find the scaling law fits the data on a linear-linear scale factor, which is significant. We start with the
4
10
M
A
 as a first order approximation. For the R intercept at R = 10 then ~ 8. If ~ 0 which can
also be considered as 10 –17 Hz, then for R = 28, we have b/a ~ -1. Thus we have the or Y intercept as (0, 8) and
the R or X intercept as (8, 0) to a good approximation so that = -R + 8. This law is derived from our graph
utilizing dimensionless quantities for c = 1 from the relation
aR
b
form
1
 , c = R/t so that R = c giving
units = c/R and R = c/ . These are the dimensional conversion factors. Then = -R+8. In our graph we are
using powers to the base 10 or plotting base 10 exponent factors. Hence we have 10
t
R
10 8
10
or
R
10 8

R
10 8
10
10
so that 10
. In this form we can take the log to the base 10 of both sides and return
to our original equation + R = 8 or    
R 8 .
E. A. Rauscher calculates the evolution of physical parameters from a big bang universe, comprising a
scaling law, which is consistent with the evolution under the constraints of a Schwarzschild universe [18]. Under the
initial conditions of the big bang (as described by current theory),
10 yields a frequency
of rotation of 10 43 Hz. Under the constraints of self consistency for its Schwarzschild condition, we have a rotational
frequency of 10 -17 Hz for the present universe.
In Figure 2a, we should mention that the form 10
10
33
44
cm
t
s
and

R
10 8
is an approximation because of the variation
in specific galactic and stellar systems. Also, we utilize the unit conversion of to R using c=1. We show this in
Figure 2a. We can also write 10

R
10 8
using dimensional analysis in terms of a new vector quantity and

  1
t
introducing a unit vector velocity as c . Then we can write
where c = 10 8 to also preserve proper
dimensionality of our and R variables. We observe an approximate linear relation between R s and M s and also
and R which is derived from fitting current astrophysical data. These fits utilize the first order Schwarzschild
condition on astrophysical and cosmological systems as well as for atomic systems. In this approach we will
analyze in detail the event horizon and ergospheric dynamics that will give us a more complete model of galactic
and stellar formation and structure. Note that the expression which we derive here is a good first order
approximation. Refinements, which include a more detailed formulation of black hole dynamics and other
cosmological factors from general relativity, will include higher order effects in our scaling law.
10
4
Figure 2a. A scaling law for organized matter of frequency vs. radiu s. The black hole system is presented in this figure.
Plotted from the top left is the mini black hole at the Planck distance of
33
10 through to the stellar-sized black holes,
larger black holes, galactic center black holes and at the lower right is a Universe-sized black hole. Note that in between
the stellar size and the Planck distance mini black hole we have included a data point for the atomic size which we as well
calculate a new value for its mass that includes the energy availabl e in the vacuum space of a nuclei and yields the correct
radius to describe an atomic resolution as mini black holes (see equation (5) to (18)) It is of interest that the microtubules
of eukaryotic cells, which have a typical length of
cm
8
2
10
cm
and an estimated vibrational frequency of
9
14
lie
10
to
10
Hz
quite close to the line specified by the scaling law and intermediate between the stellar and atomic scales [19].
Table 1. We list the associated radius, frequency, mass and velocity with various relevant systems. Plots of these values
are given in Fig. 2(a) and 2(b). Note that the mass of the atomic resolution is given as the standard value (see the
calculated value in equation (5) to (18)).
5
778638993.003.png 778638993.004.png 778638993.005.png 778638993.006.png 778638993.007.png 778638993.008.png 778638993.009.png 778638993.010.png 778638993.011.png 778638993.012.png
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin