CVO_030.pdf

(959 KB) Pobierz
No. 30, July 29, 2009
OPENINGS
WHAT’S HOT AND WHAT’S NOT?
XIIIIIIIIY
9R+L+-TRK+0
9+-WQN+PZPP0
9P+PVLPSN-+0
9+P+-+-+-0
9-+-ZP-+-+0
9+-SN-ZPN+-0
9PZPQ+LZPPZP0
9TR-VLR+-MK-0
XIIIIIIIIY
Beating the
Semi-Slav
By IM Merijn van Delft & IM Robert Ris
Frequency
Besides numerous summer tournaments we have
another look at Biel, where Vachier-Lagrave is leading
with one round to go after some unnecessary losses by
Morozevich. Negi and Avrukh shared irst at the Politiken
Cup while Wojtaszek won the Najdorf Memorial.
WHAT’S HOT?
Score
Caruana ’ s new try against the Petroff was not enough to unsettle Gelfand,
while Vachier Lagrave did beat Caruana in the Berlin endgame, underlining
the recent problems Black has had in this opening. Morozevich-Vachier
Lagrave was an epic fight in the Sicilian Najdorf (see below). Alekseev-
Caruana was a Dragon ending, in which we still prefer the 22.¦xe6! we
mentioned in CVO 23. Ivanchuk tried to play the French again with 1.d4 e6
but Morozevich replied 2.c4.
In CVO 2 we presented Radek Wojtaszek as an opening expert with a
preference for sharp positions. His victory in the Najdorf Memorial was
based on a very dynamic interpretation of 1.d4 (see PGN file). In line with
this our Game of the Week Sasikiran-Nyback sees White starting the
game in a positional manner with ever more tactics entering the position. In
the diagram position White went for 12.e4.
In Giri-Ernst (Dutch Open) Black found a most unusual square for his
queen and got away with it. Rusev-Ni Hua (Villarrobledo rapid) once more
showed that the Exchange Slav is by no means a forced draw. Golod-
Novikov is an interesting direct try to refute the Benoni.
Source: Megabase + TWIC, 2500+ only
Black was suffering in the Caro-Kann this week, especially at the Politiken Cup. Alekseev found an interesting way to battle Morozevich’
4...¤d7. As always Hector has his own interpretation of the position and the Caro-Kann with 4...¥f5 is no exception as he beat Agrest
with his personal 12.¤d2!? line. Rising star Negi first beat Nielsen (19.d5! was very to
the point and gave White a strong initiative) and one day later made Postny suffer for 133
moves before the draw was a fact (see PGN file).
WHAT’S NOT?
1 of 4
788962766.051.png 788962766.062.png 788962766.063.png 788962766.064.png 788962766.001.png 788962766.002.png 788962766.003.png 788962766.004.png 788962766.005.png 788962766.006.png 788962766.007.png 788962766.008.png 788962766.009.png 788962766.010.png 788962766.011.png 788962766.012.png 788962766.013.png 788962766.014.png 788962766.015.png 788962766.016.png 788962766.017.png 788962766.018.png 788962766.019.png 788962766.020.png
ChessVibes OPENINGS what’s hot and what’s not?
No. 30, July 29, 2009
Another positional exchange sacriice
Basically Black was doing ine in a trendy positional line of the Meran Semi-Slav, but the
position was still full of life. As soon as White got the chance he sacriiced the exchange for
an enduring initiative.
GAME OF THE WEEK
Sasikiran, K (2669) - Nyback, T (2627)
Warsaw (Najdorf Memorial), July 23, 2009
D46, Semi-Slav, 6.£c2, 7.¥d3
Black should be able to hold.
22.¦b1 £c7
XIIIIIIIIY
9R+-+R+K+0
9+LWQ-+PZPP0
9P+-+-SN-+0
9+-ZP-VLN+-0
9-+-+P+-+0
9+-ZP-+L+P0
9-+Q+-ZPP+0
9+RVLR+-MK-0
XIIIIIIIIY
23.¦xb7!
A strong and necessary sacrifice, as otherwise
Black would get a perfectly sound position after
23...¦ad8.
23...£xb7 24.¤d6 ¥xd6
24...£c6 25.¤xe8 ¦xe8 26.g3 gives White an
advantage.
25.e5 £c8 26.exd6
Nothing is achieved by 26.¦xd6?! ¦xe5 27.¥xa8
¦e1+ 28.¢h2 £xa8.
26...¦a7 27.£a4 ¦d8 28.¥f4 a5 29.¦b1
XIIIIIIIIY
9-+QTR-+K+0
9TR-+-+PZPP0
9-+-ZP-SN-+0
9ZP-ZP-+-+-0
9Q+-+-VL-+0
9+-ZP-+L+P0
9-+-+-ZPP+0
9+R+-+-MK-0
XIIIIIIIIY
29....¦a6?!
It ’ s hard to explain why Nyback voluntarily gives
up protection of the 7th rank. More stubborn
would have been 29...£e6! though here too
White retains strong pressure with 30.£b5.
30.¦b7 £f5?
Black ’ s last chance was 30...¦axd6 31.¥xd6
¦xd6 32.£xa5 but White keeps good winning
chances.
31.£c4 ¢h8 32.g4 1–0
14.¥d2 (The idea of the previous move is to
meet 14.¥d3 with 14...f5 and the pawn on e6
is protected.) 14...¥b7 15.¦ac1 e5 16.dxe5
¤xe5 17.£h4 c5 18.¤xe5 ¥xe5 19.¥c3 ¥xc3
20.¦xc3 c4 with a slightly better game for Black;
Svetushkin-Kharitonov, Rethymno 2009.
12...e5 13.h3
More common is 13.g3 (to limit the power of
the bishop on d6) 13...¦e8 14.a3 ¥b7 (14...
exd4 15.¤xd4 ¤c5 (15...c5? 16.¤dxb5) 16.¥f3
¥h3 17.¥g5 ¥e5 18.¦ac1 ¥xd4 19.¦xd4 £e5
20.¥e3 ¤g4 21.¥xg4 ¥xg4 22.f4 £e6 gave
Black an easy life in Miton-Smeets, Dresden
2008.) 15.dxe5 ¤xe5 16.¥g5 ¤xf3+ 17.¥xf3
¥e5 18.¥xf6 gxf6 19.¥g4 ¦ad8 and despite his
spoiled kingside, Black didn ’ t have much to fear
in Sasikiran-Van Wely, Cannes 2009.
13...exd4
Of course, Black could wait giving up the central
tension. For example: 13...¦e8 14.a3 ¥b7
15.dxe5 (15.¥e3 exd4 16.¤xd4 g6 17.¢h1?!
¥f8 18.¤f3 c5³ Van Wely-Kramnik, Monaco
rapid 1999) 15...¤xe5 16.¥g5 ¤xf3+ 17.¥xf3
¥e5 18.¥xf6 gxf6 19.¦ac1 ¦ad8 20.¤d5 cxd5
21.£xc7 ¥xc7 22.¦xc7 dxe4 23.¦xd8 ¦xd8
24.¦xb7 exf3 ½–½ Lafuente-Salgado Lopez,
Barcelona 2008.
14.¤xd4 ¦e8
Threatening 15...b4. 14...c5? 15.¤f5 ¥e5
16.¤e7+ ¢h8 17.¤cd5 clearly favours White.
15.a3 ¥e5
Not a bad move, but since White has played
13.h3 it would have been simpler to play
immediately 15...c5 16.¤f5 (Now 16.¤dxb5?
doesn ’ t work in view of 16...axb5 17.¤xb5 ¥h2+
18.¢h1 £b8µ.) 16...¥h2+ 17.¢h1 ¥e5 with
level play.
16.¥f3 c5 17.¤f5 ¤b6 18.a4 b4 19.a5 bxc3
20.axb6 £xb6 21.bxc3 ¥b7?
21...¦b8 22.¥e3 £b3 would have led to a known
position, where White played 13.g3 instead.
White is marginally better, but with correct play
1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.¤f3 ¤f6 4.¤c3 e6 5.e3
¤bd7 6.£c2 ¥d6 7.¥d3
A sharper alternative is 7.g4 which leads to
the Latvian Attack, while the text offers a more
positional battle.
7...0–0 8.0–0 dxc4 9.¥xc4 a6
This seems to be the most reliable possibility. 9...
b5 10.¥e2 ¥b7 11.¦d1 £c7 12.e4 e5 13.¥g5! is
currently very critical for Black as we mentioned
in previous issues of CVO.
10.¦d1
Another line goes 10.a4 c5 which was for
example seen in the 6th game of the rapid
match between Anand and Leko, Miskolc 2009.
Here Black has reasonable chances to equalize
as well.
10...b5 11.¥e2 £c7
Inferior is 11...¥b7?! as after 12.e4 Black is
unable to answer with the standard reply ...e5.
Moreover, the queen is also not comfortable
on e7, because Black can hardly take on d4 as
then the knight will come to f5 with gain of time.
XIIIIIIIIY
9R+L+-TRK+0
9+-WQN+PZPP0
9P+PVLPSN-+0
9+P+-+-+-0
9-+-ZP-+-+0
9+-SN-ZPN+-0
9PZPQ+LZPPZP0
9TR-VLR+-MK-0
XIIIIIIIIY
12.e4
12.¤e4 has been seen more frequently lately.
After 12...¤xe4 13.£xe4 the latest trend is
13...¦e8!? (13...e5 14.£d3 exd4 15.£xd4 ¥e7
16.£f4! was introduced in Kasimdzhanov-
Aronian, Nalchik 2009 - see CVO 17 - while
13...¥b7 14.¥d3 g6 15.£h4 c5 16.¤g5 h5
17.¥e4 ¥e7 18.¥xb7 £xb7 19.£g3 £b8 was
Ragger-Gustafsson, Rogaska Slatina 2009)
SASIKIRAN - NYBACK
2 of 4
788962766.021.png 788962766.022.png 788962766.023.png 788962766.024.png 788962766.025.png 788962766.026.png 788962766.027.png 788962766.028.png 788962766.029.png 788962766.030.png 788962766.031.png 788962766.032.png 788962766.033.png
ChessVibes OPENINGS what’s hot and what’s not?
No. 30, July 29, 2009
THIS WEEK’S HARVEST
Najdorf, English Attack
XIIIIIIIIY
9R+L+KVL-TR0
9+-WQN+PZP-0
9P+-+PSN-ZP0
9+-+P+-+-0
9-ZP-SNPSNPZP0
9+-+-VLP+-0
9PZPPWQ-+-+0
9+-MKR+L+R0
XIIIIIIIIY
1.e4 c5 2.¤f3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.¤xd4 ¤f6 5.¤c3 a6 6.f3 e6 7.¥e3 b5
8.£d2 ¤bd7 9.g4 h6 10.0–0–0 b4 11.¤ce2 £c7 12.h4 d5 13.¤f4
The early ...b4 push in the English Attack of the Najdorf has become a common theme since its introduction by
Topalov. Instead of using basic rules of developing, Black immediately strives for counter-attacking. As a rule
of thumb, White needs to sacrifice material in order to expose Black ’ s king to White ’ s major pieces. Creative as
usual, Morozevich came up with a very powerful idea (13.¤f4!) not hiding his intentions to launch a bomb on
e6. Vachier-Lagrave, who was obviously not well prepared for this idea, quickly ended up in a very suspicious
position. A short computer check learned us humans that Moro missed some big chances (24.¥e6 while 26.¦xf8!
would have won on the spot). Already 13...e5 seems to be a huge mistake, where Black should have taken up
the challenge with 13...dxe4, as then the sacrifice on e6 has lost its effect. After missing his chances, Moro lost
the thread and after a heroic fight the young Frenchman brought home the full point.
Caro-Kann, 4...¤d7
XIIIIIIIIY
9R+-+KVL-TR0
9ZPP+QZPP+-0
9-+P+L+P+0
9+-+-+-+-0
9-+PZP-+P+0
9+-+-VLP+-0
9PZP-WQ-+-+0
9+-MKR+LTR-0
XIIIIIIIIY
1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.¤c3 dxe4 4.¤xe4 ¤d7 5.¤f3 ¤gf6 6.¤xf6+ ¤xf6 7.c3 ¥g4 8.h3 ¥h5 9.g4 ¥g6 10.¤e5 ¥e4 11.f3 ¥d5
12.¥e3 g6 13.c4 ¥e6 14.£d2 h5 15.¦g1 hxg4 16.hxg4 ¤d7 17.¤xd7 £xd7 18.0–0–0
Even though 4...¥f5 is by far the most popular move, 4...¤d7 seems to suit creative players like Morozevich,
Bologan and Wojtaszek. In Alekseev-Morozevich White chose the solid 5.¤f3, which has an interesting
psychological point. When Black settles for the normal 8...¥xf3, like Karpov used to do, it is extremely hard
(for both sides) to play for a win. White ’ s pair of bishops seems to be completely compensated for by Black ’ s
massive pawn structure. Moro wouldn ’ t be Moro if he didn ’ t find a way to unbalance the position anyway with
8...¥h5, 9...¥g6 and the virtually new 10...¥e4!. After the alternatives 10...¤d7 11.¤xg6 hxg6 12.d5 and 10...e6
11.h4 White enjoys a nice initiative. In the diagram position White seems to have a harmonious attacking setup,
but in reality the Black king may even be the safer one. In the game Black was on top most of the time until he
blundered with 43...e6. It seems that White should return to the critical 5.¤g5 in future games.
Slav, Exchange, 6.¥f4 ¥f5
XIIIIIIIIY
9R+-+-+K+0
9+-+-+-+-0
9-+R+PZP-+0
9+-+P+L+P0
9-+-ZP-+PZP0
9+-+-ZP-ZP-0
9PTR-+-+P+0
9TR-+-+NMK-0
XIIIIIIIIY
1.d4 d5 2.¤f3 ¤f6 3.c4 c6 4.cxd5 cxd5 5.¤c3 ¤c6 6.¥f4 ¥f5 7.e3 e6 8.£b3 ¥b4
9.¥b5 0–0 10.0–0 ¥xc3 11.£xc3 ¦c8 12.¦fc1 ¤e4 13.£a3 g5 14.¥g3 f6 15.¥xc6 bxc6 16.£xa7 h5
17.h4 g4 18.¤h2 ¤xg3 19.fxg3 £d6 20.¤f1 ¦a8 21.£c5 £xc5 22.¦xc5 ¦fb8 23.¦xc6 ¦xb2
Recently we mentioned how Kamsky fought his way to victory against the notorious Exchange Slav and this
week Ni Hua beat a grandmaster virtually without thinking. On move six Black has an interesting choice to make.
6...¥f5 is perfectly fine, but keeping the white-squared bishop inside the pawn chain with 6...e6 as Dreev does is
just as playable and might keep more tension in the position. Confusing the opponent with 6...¤h5!? is another
consideration. After 8.¥d3 ¥xd3 9.£xd3 Black doesn ’ t have to play the automatic 9...¥d6 but can claim the
somewhat better bishop after 9...¥e7. With 12...¤e4 and 13...g5!? Black grabbed the initiative on the kingside,
an idea that takes many forms in these positions. The first 21 moves were played twice before, showing that Ni
Hua did his homework well. In the pretty final position the White rook got trapped.
Benoni, Taimanov (7.f4)
XIIIIIIIIY
9R+L+K+-TR0
9ZPP+N+PVLP0
9-+-+P+P+0
9+LZPP+-+N0
9-+-+-+-WQ0
9+-SN-+-+-0
9PZP-MK-+PZP0
9TR-VLQ+-SNR0
XIIIIIIIIY
1.d4 ¤f6 2.c4 c5 3.d5 e6 4.¤c3 exd5 5.cxd5 d6 6.e4 g6 7.f4 ¥g7 8.¥b5+ ¤bd7 9.e5 dxe5 10.fxe5 ¤h5 11.e6 £h4+ 12.¢d2
While a draw with Black is considered by many as a fine result, one tends to forget about risky openings like the
Benoni. White has a wide range of choice in building up his position, with the Taimanov Variation (7.f4) being the
sharpest possibility. The position after 11...£h4 has been analysed quite extensively already, mainly resulting in
an ending of two pieces against rook, which objectively should be fine for Black. As this comes from a standard
series of moves, 12.¢d2 has been more or less neglected by top players, except for Kasparov, who used it once
in a simultaneous exhibition. White is ready to pick up the piece and defend with his pieces on the back rank in
Steinitz style. In the game Golod-Novikov, the players agreed to a draw after a repetition, but 18.£g4 seems
to be an interesting attempt, which was already seen in a previous encounter. Certainly new findings will be
revealed soon in this sideline.
3 of 4
788962766.034.png 788962766.035.png 788962766.036.png 788962766.037.png 788962766.038.png 788962766.039.png 788962766.040.png 788962766.041.png 788962766.042.png 788962766.043.png 788962766.044.png 788962766.045.png
ChessVibes OPENINGS what’s hot and what’s not?
No. 30, July 29, 2009
OPENING EXPERT
Who: Johnny Hector
Born: February 13, 1964
Nationality: Sweden
Rating: 2647
Expertise: Gifted attacking player, various hypersharp variations in his repertoire.
Why:
The opening experts are getting ever younger these days. Hector, of
the older generation, is an exception to this rule, and has absolutely no
problems matching himself with his younger colleagues. His style can
be best described as fearless, no matter which colour he plays, Hector’s
play always contains some risks. He prefers sharp, unusual openings with
a lot of imbalances. Playing White, many players fear his approach to
different Sicilian systems. He is a typical all-or-nothing player, so in case
his attack won’t succeed, he usually ends up in a strategically hopeless
position. The game below is a good example that without loads of theory,
one can launch a dangerous attack, based on a solid development.
Key game:
Hector - Agrest , Helsingor (Politiken Cup), July 22, 2009
In the current game, Hector easily creates a
stable edge based on his space advantage. In
the middlegame phase it ’ s very interesting to
see the way the Swedish GM brings his pieces
into the direction of his opponent ’ s king and so
poses serious problems.
12.¤d2
A speciality of Hector ’ s. 12.¥d2 is the main way
for White.
12...¤gf6 13.c4 ¥e7 14.£e2 0–0 15.0–0 ¦fe8
16.a3
16.¦fd1 was earlier seen in the game Hector-
Iordachescu, Copenhagen 2005.
16...£d8 17.¦ad1 a5 18.¤f3 a4 19.¤e5 ¤f8
20.£f3 ¤8h7 21.¦d3 ¥d6 22.¤e2 £e7 23.¤c3
¦ed8 24.¦fd1 ¥c7 25.£e2 ¤g5 26.¦g3
With minimum effort, Hector has brought his
pieces into play and suddenly Black ’ s position
starts looking very suspicious.
26...¤fh7 27.¥c1 c5
Typical to meet an attack on the king with a
break in the centre, but it seems it comes too
late for Black already.
28.¤b5 cxd4 29.f4 ¥xe5 30.£xe5 f6 31.£e2
¤f7 32.¦xd4
White ’ s attack has been stopped, but at a high
price. The knight on h7 is out of play, while Black
also has some other weaknesses to deal with.
32...f5?
XIIIIIIIIY
9R+-TR-+K+0
9+P+-WQNZPN0
9-+-+P+-ZP0
9+N+-+P+P0
9P+PTR-ZP-+0
9ZP-+-+-TR-0
9-ZP-+Q+P+0
9+-VL-+-MK-0
XIIIIIIIIY
32...e5 33.¦xd8+ ¦xd8 34.¤c3.
33.¥d2! £h4 34.¥e1 £e7 35.¦g6 ¤f8
35...¤f6 36.¥b4 £e8 37.¦xd8 ¦xd8 38.¥c3 A
murderer has arrived on the long diagonal.
36.¥b4 £h4 37.¥xf8 ¦xf8
37...¢xf8 38.¤c7 ¦xd4 39.¤xe6+.
38.¤c7 e5 39.¦d7 ¦ae8 40.¤xe8 ¦xe8 41.fxe5
¢f8 42.e6 1–0
1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.¤c3 dxe4 4.¤xe4 ¥f5 5.¤g3
¥g6 6.h4 h6 7.¤f3 ¤d7 8.h5 ¥h7 9.¥d3 ¥xd3
10.£xd3 e6 11.¥f4 £a5+
XIIIIIIIIY
9R+-+KVLNTR0
9ZPP+N+PZP-0
9-+P+P+-ZP0
9WQ-+-+-+P0
9-+-ZP-VL-+0
9+-+Q+NSN-0
9PZPP+-ZPP+0
9TR-+-MK-+R0
XIIIIIIIIY
www.chessvibes.com/openings
ChessVibes Openings is a weekly PDF magazine that covers the latest news on chess openings. Which openings are hot in top level chess?
Which are not? Editors IM Merijn van Delft & IM Robert Ris keep you updated once a week! Singles issues cost € 1. You can subscribe too:
€ 25 a year (that’s less than € 0.50 per issue!). More info can be found at www.chessvibes.com/openings .
© 2009 ChessVibes. Copyright exists in all original material published by ChessVibes. Any copying or distribution (reproduction, via print, electronic format, or in any form whatsoever), as
well as posting on the web, is strictly prohibited without prior written permission.
4 of 4
788962766.046.png 788962766.047.png 788962766.048.png 788962766.049.png 788962766.050.png 788962766.052.png 788962766.053.png 788962766.054.png 788962766.055.png 788962766.056.png 788962766.057.png 788962766.058.png 788962766.059.png 788962766.060.png 788962766.061.png
 
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin